The Last Unicorn (Deluxe Edition)

If you're looking for the perfect moderately priced Christmas gift, I'd suggest the recently released deluxe edition of The Last Unicorn. Published by ROC, this edition includes the definitive text of Peter S. Beagle's classic novel, his Hugo and Nebula Award-winning novella sequel (coda?) "Two Hearts," introductions to both works, an interview with Beagle, and more. However, the kicker is that Barnes and Noble is carrying a specially priced version of the deluxe edition priced at only $9.95. I purchased a copy today and it is an extremely nice hardback with dust cover. For the life of me, I can't tell the difference between this version and the deluxe edition that sells for $29.95 or more at other bookstores (if you can even find a copy).

Anyone needing a bigger Peter S. Beagle fix would do well to check out his story "We Never Talk About My Brother" from issue 5 of Orson Scott Card's Intergalactic Medicine Show. The issue also features a very good interview with Beagle by IGMS editor Edmund R. Schubert.

SFWA: Screaming Flaming Writers Association?

In a follow-up to last week's fun and screams about the SFWA, John Scalzi reports that all the outrage has caused the organization to correct the copyright committee problem. I'm sure some people will say this shows how responsive the SFWA is to criticism, but it doesn't change my view that I'm not going to waste my time by joining. While I support all the official goals of the organization, I can't get past the fact that incidents like this haven't been the exception in recent years for the SFWA but are instead the norm. Maybe they ought to rename themselves the Screaming Flaming Writers Association? Still, I'm glad they've sorted all this out and I hope it means the organization has turned a new page in its history.

SF authors pick favorite SF films (and I add a few more)

From SF Signal comes a link to the best science fiction and other related films as picked by authors such as Robert Bloch, Arthur C. Clarke, and Frederik Pohl. The only downside is that the list is from 1994; as such, it's heavily weighted with films from the middle of the 20th century while more recent films receive few mentions.

A few post-1994 SF films I'd add to the list include Gattaca (1997), Children of Men (2006), Twelve Monkeys (1995), and most importantly, Alex Proyas's masterpiece Dark City (1998).

Review: 2008 Novel and Short Story Writer's Market

The 2008 Novel and Short Story Writer's Market (N&SSW) is now out from Writers Digest Books. While I'm of a mixed mind about the book's usefulness in actually submitting to fiction markets, I've decided to recommend it once again for both new and experienced writers.

First, the back story on my mixed recommendation. When I reviewed last year's edition, I mentioned that one problem overtaking the venerable market compilation is that online resources like Duotrope's Digest and Ralan's listing (which is specifically for speculative fiction writers) have overtaken N&SSW by offering free submission information that's more up-to-date than anything a printed book can offer. I especially like Duotrope Digest, which offers an easy-to-use online market and submission database. When I asked N&SSW editor Lauren Mosko if Writer's Digest Books was considering making all of N&SSW's listings available online, she said that "Free market resource sites like Duotrope's Digest are certainly on our radar, but we feel confident Writer's Market will remain the brand writers can trust." Lauren added that they were preparing for the upcoming redesign and relaunch of WritersMarket.com.

So it's now a year later. One very good change is that N&SSW began offering a nice blog, which contains market and other useful writing information. I highly recommend writers check out the blog on a regular basis. In addition, the updated Writersmarket.com has been launched. However, Writersmarket.com remains a subscriber based system which, in my opinion, doesn't offer enough extra information and ability above Duotrope Digest to justify the subscription cost of $29.99 for one year. In addition, purchasing N&SSW doesn't give you access to Writersmarket.com. So when you buy the book you're locked into an already out of date data set, at least with regards to market information.

However, I'm still recommending the market guide because editors Lauren Mosko and Michael Schweer have compiled an amazing collection of articles to aid both beginning or experienced writers. N&SSW once again features in-depth information on writing and submitting in genres such as literary fiction, mysteries, romance, and more; of particular interest to SF/F writers is an informative interview with author Kelly Link and John Joseph Adams' "Speculative Fiction: The Next Generation." For me, the authors interviews are the best part of N&SSW, especially since they give valuable insight into the business side of writing and help writers benefit from the mistakes and successes of others.

So if you're looking for a book which helps you write and submit a compelling story, along with giving useful advice from top authors in all fictional genres, this is a great book to own. But if you're purchasing N&SSW merely for the market listings, I suggest you give N&SSW a pass and move over to Duotrope.

Santa Claus Conquers The Martians

As Dan Schneider asks over on the Moderate Voice, what's the difference between Santa Claus Conquers The Martians and other films in the "so bad they're good" genre like Plan 9 From Outer Space,Robot Monster and The Beast From Yucca Flats? Santa Claus Conquers The Martians was made and targeted specifically for children! So grab the kiddies, pop this film into the DVD, and expose a new generation to a true classic of cinema.

Don't give away the film's ending by actually reading the book

So the chattering Hollywood classes are all agog at Will Smith accidentally giving away the ending to the upcoming film I Am Legend. Of course, anyone who has actually read Richard Matheson's 1954 novel of the same title probably has a decent idea what the mysterious ending is (unless Hollywood has totally butchered the storyline, which would be another reason to be all agog). Why do I suspect the people worrying about keeping the film's ending secret are all people who haven't read a single book in the last ten years?

UPDATE: Of course, one also hopes the director wasn't stupid enough to give the movie a happy Hollywood ending. But I'm not betting against it.

Story of the week: "Molly and the Red Hat" by Benjamin Rosenbaum

My new story of the week is "Molly and the Red Hat" by Benjamin Rosenbaum from issue 213 of Interzone. This short tale (only 3,200 words) is in many ways a compressed, modern day Alice in Wonderland focusing on a kindergartener named Molly and her quest for a thrown away red hat. Rosenbaum's world is seemingly torn from Lewis Carroll's mind; however, where Alice had to fall down the rabbit-hole to enter her fantasy, Molly's fantasies exists in parallel to her disturbingly real world. As the story progresses, Rosenbaum's meticulous craft blurs the boundaries between reality and fantasy until it is difficult to say whether or not Molly's adventures truly happened. Is she the one imagining things? Or should we the readers question our own world's reality?

This is one of the most strikingly beautiful and lyrical stories I have read this year and showcases the power of concise yet mythical world building. I also found it ironic that less than a week after criticizing another of Rosenbaum's stories for being too short and lacking deep characterization--his "The King of the Djinn" from the new issue of Realms of Fantasy--I find myself in love with this equally short tale. In many ways the success of "Molly and the Red Hat" proves yet again how creating true-to-life characters is one of the most important aspects to successful fiction. And with Molly, Rosenbaum has definitely created the most fascinating and true-life kindergartener it's ever been my joy to read about.

More SFWA

In a follow-up to yesterday's post about the SWFA, I wanted to mention that Tobais Buckell has quit the organization over all this pettiness. As he says:

I know people online will fight. I know people will struggle over differing opinions. But still, I have this odd opinion that more gets done in forums where respect and civility prevail. Yeah, I've been mocked for expecting that civility and professionalism decorum prevail, and even tried my best to lead by example. But it made no difference. I would happily remain in SFWA, if there were some other way that news was communicated timely to members without my having to wade into the muck, but as it is, too many big decisions came about in there, decisions that if I were part of an organization, I wanted input on.

And if I weren’t a part of 3 professional organizations (2 writers ones) that had online civility and professional, I might even imagine that the mockers were correct. But I’ve seen how professionals can conduct themselves even with wildly differing opinions, and I know what it is.

Amen to everything Toby says in his post. Hearing about all this from people like him has convinced me to keep my hard-earned money and sanity well away from this organization.

Resnick: Too many Hugos?

The new issue of Baen's Universe is out and features Mike Resnick's essay "Breeding Like Rabbits—Or Hugos," in which the Baen editor wonders if there are too many Hugo Awards handed out each year. When the Hugos were started in 1953, there were only six categories: Best Novel, Best Magazine, Best Cover Artist, Best Interior Artist, Excellence in Fact Articles, and Best New Author. Then came the Hugo for Best Fanzine, which Locus eventually began winning year after year. To even things up, the "Worldcon committee came up with a brand-new category--Best Semiprozine--where Locus could win every year to its heart's content and traditional fanzines could once more win the Best Fanzine Hugo." Then a second dramatic category Hugo was created because TV shows couldn't compete against movies, and this year a new editing Hugo was created so book and magazine editors wouldn't have to compete against each other.

According to Resnick, "it's become a bit of demonstrable folk wisdom that if you lose enough Hugos, sooner or later you can put together enough disenfranchised (read: Hugo-losing) friends so that you can get a new Hugo category installed and maybe have a chance to win one." The end result: Of the fourteen Hugos now given out every year, only four go to actual written science fiction--what Resnick says is the reason for the Hugos existing in the first place.

But is written SF/F the only reason for the Hugos? No. I agree with Resnick that written SF/F is the heart of our genre, but the SF/F community exists well beyond that. The problem with Resnick's argument is that when I look over the Hugo categories, there are none that I would get rid of. However, Resnick is correct that whenever one person or entity wins the same Hugo over and over, there are calls for creating a new Hugo category. One example of a coming problem along these lines is the Hugo Award for Best Fan Writer, which David Langford has won for almost 20 years in a row because of his great Ansible newsletter.

I'm sure the calls are already out there for a new fan writer Hugo so others can compete (although one wonders why writers can't simply compete by, well, out-competing Langford). I wouldn't be surprised if we soon see a "best blogger" or "best blog" Hugo split off from the fan writer award. However, a better approach might be to limit the number of consecutive wins any one author or publication can have in any given multi-year time period. Such an approach might stop the cascade effect Resnick worries about while continuing to honor those who contribute so much to SF/F.

Another reason not to join the SFWA

I now qualify for associate member status in the SFWA, but every time I think about joining I read something like this post from Charles Stross. John Scalzi has a less enraged view of the matter, but my thought is why join an organization whose sole purpose appears to be creating continual tempests in a teapot among its members. I mean, there are already enough ways for life to distract me from writing without bringing in even more drama.

Getting your Fix with short fiction reviews

TTA Press, the publisher of Interzone, Black Static, and Crimewave, has debuted an online short fiction review site called The Fix. Originally published for nearly a decade as a print magazine, the Fix is now a purely online venture. So far, the reviews I've read are excellent, while the simple yet classy web design makes finding and reading the reviews an enjoyable experience.

For what it's worth, the Fix's Ziv Wities also takes a less than charitable view of my short story "Freelanga" in the recent anthology I Am This Meat. As Ziv says, its "A solid story, mostly aimed at building up the final scene; this reader found Freelanga pleasant but unremarkable." Ah well. Guess I can't be dishing out my own reviews in this blog if I can't take the heat of what other people think about my stories.

Should newbies write novels or short stories?

Author S.L. Farrell says fledgling writers often ask him, "Is writing short stories first a good way to start 'breaking into' writing novels?" While you can read his response for yourself, the short answer is . . . maybe. Be sure to check out the comments on the post, where other writers are giving their own views on this question. Thanks to John Joseph Adams for first linking to Farrell's question and answer.

Review: Realms of Fantasy Dec. 2007 and Feb. 2008

Because I've been behind on my offerings to the review gods, today I present a double sacrifice: the two most recent issues of Realms of Fantasy.

Overall, the Dec. 2007 issue is a fun and extremely satisfying issue. To start things off, Virginia Borges presents a fascinating look at the Little Mermaid fables and stories. The Disney animated film was the first movie Borges ever saw and heavily influenced her then five-year-old sensibilities. As she recounts, "I made myself a mermaid's tail from a sheet of butcher paper spangled with sequins and glitter" and wondered why "my mother always insisted on reading (the original story) aloud to me." This is a compelling mix of personal and mythical exploration and is highly recommended. The essay is published online here.

There are also a number of excellent stories in the issue, including a new Lord Yamada tale by Richard Parks. While "Hot Water" continues Park's light-hearted yet haunted journey through ancient Japan, the story isn't quite up to his "A Touch of Hell" from the April 2007 RoF. But since the characters of Lord Yamada and Kenji the priest are so compelling, this new story remains a very good read. Another good story in the issue is "The Fireman's Fairy" by Sandra McDonald, about a fire department using assistance from mythical creatures. Naturally, this leads to a pairing between an overly macho fireman and a flaming fairy called Tinkerbob. While this may seem like a buddy-movie cliche in the making, McDonald pulls off the story through good writing, pacing, and characterization. Only at the end does the tale bog a bit down when the author tries too hard to beat a moral of tolerance into her readers' heads. Still, it's a good read. The issue also features an enjoyable fantasy story along more traditional lines in "The White Isle" by Von Carr (the pen name of Siobhan Carroll, although I'm not sure why one uses a pen name while also giving your real name).

While the December issue is a good, fun read, the February 2008 issue of RoF steps things up a notch by publishing a great story in "Hobnoblin Blues" by Elizabeth Bear (see my previous review of the story here.) While Bear's story is a hard act to follow, the issue still features strong fiction from M.K. Hobson (with the adorable "The People's Republic of the Edelweiss Village Putt-Putt Gold Course") and Margaret Ronald (with the priest/wolf story "And Spare Not the Flock"). In fact, of all the fiction in the issue, the only story which didn't agree with me was "The King of the Djinn" by Benjamin Rosenbaum. While this story of a Middle Eastern father's friendship with a supernatural being starts off well, it is so short that only the father's character has the depth of a real person. As a result, his friendship and ultimate betrayal by the supernatural being doesn't ring as true as it might if the story had fleshed out the relationship more.

These two issues are the best RoF has produced in the past year (and I say that while noting RoF had a number of strong issues during 2007). My only major complaint is that the Feb. 2008 issue returns to the RoF pattern of putting movie promo photos on the cover (in this case, for The Golden Compass). I really liked the original art by Julie Fain in the Dec. 2007 and wish RoF would do this more often. But that said, with all the worry lately about failing SF/F magazines, if the choice comes down to either having a massive ad on the front cover or having no RoF at all, I'll go with the ad any day.

Best SF/F of the Year, Volume 2

John Joseph Adams has posted the line-up for The Best Science Fiction and Fantasy of the Year, Volume 2, edited by Jonathan Strahan and published by Night Shade Books. While the anthology won't be out til next year, I'd suggest reserving a copy. Among the selections I've read is Ted Chiang's "The Merchant and the Alchemist's Gate," which remains one of my favorite stories from the past year. Stories I haven't read but look forward to seeing include "The Witch's Headstone" by Neil Gaiman and "The Last and Only, or, Mr. Moscowitz Becomes French" by Peter S. Beagle.

Jumping the shark, SF/F style

There's been lots of discussion lately about when particular science fiction movie series jumped the shark. Jay Garmon at Sci-fi rant says the Star Trek series jumped it with the First Contact movie, while with Star War it was the Midi-Chlorians of The Phantom Menace (meaning the Jedi knights are merely a master race, not meditation masters in touch with the greater universe). I agree with Jay about the Star Trek movies--First Contact was where I lost interest in the series. But with Star Wars, I believe John at SF Signal hits the nail on the head by saying that the true shark jumping was with the Ewoks. Evidently Lucas had originally planned for the Return of the Jedi to focus on Wookies, but for merchandising reasons made a script change to "cute, cuddly Ewok toys." The rest, as they say, was shark jumping history.

In my opinion, other SF/F cinema shark jumping includes the killing off of all the best characters at the start of Alien 3. I mean, hey, when you have a great character like the android Bishop (played so perfectly by Lance Henriksen), why wouldn't the first thought of any director be "How can I get rid of this SOB?" Another shark jumping moment is the Wachowski brothers believing that their hip look at religious themes in the first Matrix movie was worth total immersion in philosophical babble during the next two films. The shark finally ate the Wachowskis when Neo was crucified in The Matrix Revolutions. After all, if you're going to jump the shark, there's no need to be subtle about your intentions.

Everything you never wanted to know about submissions

So you've dredged up your soul and transformed it into 6,000 words of concise, literary, speculative fiction angst. Now all you need to do is publish the dang thing so the literary applause and money can roll in like a tsunami. Unfortunately, there's one problem standing in your way: The slush pile.

Yesterday I submitted a story to Interzone, a wonderful British science fiction and fantasy magazine. According to editor Jetse de Vries, so far this month he has received 276 submissions, totaling 1.3 million words of writing. 1.3 MILLION WORDS! That's equal to more than sixteen 80,000 word novels. Out of those submissions, Interzone may end up publishing five stories. If those odds don't scare you as a writer, then you are certifiable and shouldn't be writing fiction in the first place. Do the rest of us a favor and place your stories in an old filing cabinet so there's less competition. :-)

Seriously, every writer needs to know the odds they are facing. These odds apply to every fictional genre--be it literary fiction, SF/F, mysteries, or romances. But in the end, there's nothing a writer can do but keep writing his or her stories and submitting them again and again--no matter the odds.

"Book Scouts of the Galactic Rim" in Menda City Review

My short story "Book Scouts of the Galactic Rim" has just been published in Menda City Review. The story skirts the boundaries of science fiction and literary fiction, placing the tale well within the slipstream genre (which in many ways simply means the story doesn't fit neatly into any literary genre). My thanks to Terry Rogers for taking a chance with the story and publishing it in his amazing literary journal, which is one of the best designed and most thought-provoking online journals out there.

Story of the Week: "Hobnoblin Blues" by Elizabeth Bear

I generally dislike stories which merge popular music and literature. Too often, this subgenre of fiction feels like a literary short cut where authors use the goodwill and world building from a style of music--be it rock and roll, rap, blues, or so on--to make up for deficiencies in their own stories. For example, if a story features a character murdering his mother while listening to Led Zeppelin's "Stairway to Heaven," the author doesn't need to do as much literary heavy lifting with character development and emotional resonance because readers can use their knowledge of the song to fill the story's missing pieces.

In addition, the use of today's popular music in fiction too often strikes me as overly dated and elitist. Overly dated because while today's readers may know a song that hit the top ten a year ago, is it likely tomorrow's readers can say the same? Or that future readers will have the same emotional reaction to the song? As for elitist, too many songs referenced in fiction are rather obscure, giving the reader a feeling that the author is playing games like a character from the movie High Fidelity (i.e., thumbing their nose at anyone who doesn't know their favorite cutting-edge musician).

But now that I've ranted about how not to use music in literature, let me give you an example of how to do it right: "Hobnoblin Blues" by Elizabeth Bear. My new story of the week is found in the February 2008 issue of Realms of Fantasy and features the Norse trickster god Loki, who has been exiled to earth and is living as a glam/punk rock star of the 1970s and 80s. While Bear uses the themes and tropes from these musical eras to flesh out her story's background, the tale itself is totally unique, featuring a gender-defying and mortal Loki desperate to share his knowledge with humanity before he/she dies. In this way, Bear has picked up on a theme of modern pop music which fiction writers too often ignore: how every bimbo and bimguy who finds success strumming a guitar or hacking out a boy-band melody suddenly feels an irrepressible urge to change the world. But where most pop stars merely use their socially conscious pose to be trendy, the Loki of Bear's story actually has something important to tell the world. And the gods help us if we ignore him/her. And the gods help us if we actually listen.

One of the strengths of Bear's story is her amazing writing style, which alternates between rock magazine-style interviews with Loki, rock articles about him/her, and the point of view of Loki's assistant Hobnoblin, who was exiled along with his master. While I've seen stories using interview and article writing styles go horribly wrong, in Bear's hands it simply goes wonderfully right. In addition, Bear has created a Loki with whom readers emotionally connects--a rare feat whenever one is writing about god-like creatures, let alone one so delved into as Loki. In short, this is a great story. If you're not already a subscriber to Realms of Fantasy, look for a copy in your local bookstore in the next few weeks.