« Sheila Williams Deserves the Hugo Award | Main | My 2010 Hugo, Nebula, and Locus Award Recommendations »

January 17, 2011

Comments

I think you are mistaken (or made a typo: as you know, Bob, it's hard to publish magazines with number of pages not divisible by 4, and preferably a higher binary power). Ikarie went through some changes in page count, but the traditional (and minimum) was 64; the last year had 80 (you can see the yellow band "+16 pages of stories" on the cover; it was added as editors' last-ditch response to the management's doubling the price for non-subscribers).

The title's origin is a bit more complex: Ikarie was a descendant of fanzine/semi-samizdat "science fiction almanacs" published in late 1980es and titled Ikarie XB-1 to Ikarie XB-4, mainly to circumvent the regime's restrictions of periodical press. Thus "XB-1" is in a way return to the beginning.

And yes, it not only appears but is a confirmed and obvious fact that XB-1 will not change composition substantially, certainly not in having a third of foreign stories: In fact, the magazine could never have been out so fast if it were not the prepared December issue of Ikarie that the editors were able to carry over under the new masthead, even though the publisher wasn't willing to let go of the brand.

Jan: Thanks for the update. Since I live in the U.S. I had always received a year's worth of Ikarie at one time; as such, I hadn't seen the new 80 pagers.

Official version is that the magazine Ikarie was named after the film, so you are absolutely right. It is not necessary to mention the fanzine. And no, the magazine XB-1 isn't the same magazine with a new name. Maybe it looks similar, but we are a new magazine (the publisher of Ikarie disagreed with any mention about XB-1 as the successor of Ikarie).

The comments to this entry are closed.